Small-minded SFA must ditch parochial mentality if Scotland are to thrive

 

There was one element of the Scottish Football Association’s otherwise baffling decision to give Steve Clarke a four‑year deal weeks before a World Cup ball had been kicked that made sense.

When assessing alternatives to Clarke as the Scotland manager, it is apparent that paucity of talent among the country’s footballers is replicated in the coaching ranks. Clarke’s sudden resignation places the SFA in a position it was not only desperate to avoid but requires something it typically lacks; out‑of‑the-box thinking. Clarke has spared himself and his paymasters an acrimonious, lengthy goodbye while placing them in precisely the quandary they thought they had seen off.

The great paradox of Scotland’s World Cup. The fans, superb. The team? Dismal

Ewan Murray

Ewan Murray

Read more

History should treat Clarke fondly. He ended his nation’s painful wait to appear at major tournaments. This was done three times, despite massive limitations on playing resources, to which Clarke’s critics appear blind. It was such a pity his tenure ended amid polemic relating to another finals disappointment. Scotland froze at the World Cup, which is at least partly the responsibility of coaching.

Had Clarke determined, as was originally his position, that this World Cup and a seven-year stint was sufficient to stop familiarity breeding contempt, people would have been more sanguine about his departure. This always felt a salient end point. Instead there is bewilderment about why his paymasters seemed unwilling to factor in events in the US when tying up Clarke for a potential tenure of more than a decade. The SFA’s approach to all things Clarke has been typically tone deaf and arrogant.

Clarke does not need the aggravation provided by a demanding football nation and an ageing player pool that is diminishing all the time. He does not need the money, either; the 62-year-old has admitted previously that he timed his switch from assistant to manager when he was self-sufficient enough to fail. It turned out he did not anyway. While Clarke will be hurt by the nature of Scotland’s timid exit, one glance at his demeanour during post‑match media duties in Miami on Wednesday depicted an individual who could live a far more peaceful life.

Clarke is an honourable man who has done an honourable and rare thing by choosing to walk out on guaranteed money. Criticism of him has all-too-often been personal and over the top. And it was striking that in a lengthy open letter to supporters and staff, Clarke did not expand on the precise reasons for his resignation or thoughts on why Scotland fell short in the US. As the 11th-ranked third-placed team out of 12, the Scots were a long way adrift of their stated aim of reaching the last 32.

The SFA is left in the position of having to prove its decision‑making can be anything other than lazy. Administrative lightweights, so fond of the limelight under circumstances of their own choosing, will need to raise their game. The recent appointment of Craig Mulholland as chief football officer has done nothing to remove the whiff of a culture that is all too cosy and narrow in outlook.